Hero image

CGR Critical Raw Materials

Upstream: Extraction, processing, and manufacturing


Lithium's upstream trajectory reflects a younger, rapidly scaling industry. As shown in Chart 16 below, assumptions made in the model based on literature illustrate an upward trend in ore-to-metal ratio, which stabilises throughout the projection. This is consistent with improvements in lithium processing and the maturation of an industry that, until relatively recently, operated at modest scale with limited investment in material efficiency. The pace of this ramp-up, however, is bounded by more than processing maturity alone—deposit cost structure (the breakdown of costs associated with extraction) also sets a limit on how quickly supply can scale.79

Loading...

Chart 16, Upstream dynamics from ore to refinery for lithium

The figure below illustrates the more revealing upstream signal at the semi-fabrication stage. Historically, losses between refining and semi-fabrication were extraordinarily large, with much of the refined lithium never becoming recoverable. This reflects lithium's historical application profile. Uses such as ceramics, glass, and greases made up a large share of lithium end-uses and are inherently dispersive, chemically binding lithium into products from which recovery is not practically possible. The model assumes that as battery applications come to dominate, semi-fabrication losses decline sharply as a share of refined output, a trend which is projected to continue through to 2050, consistent with available literature and data on lithium's changing application mix.80 This is an important assumption underpinning the model: the transition towards batteries has not only transformed lithium demand, but is assumed to make the material substantially more recoverable in principle, by shifting it away from applications where recovery was effectively impossible and towards applications where it becomes technically feasible.

Manufacturing-stage losses follow a different trajectory, as they are assumed to grow as a share of output as battery manufacturing expands. This is consistent with the expected characteristics of a young, rapidly growing manufacturing sector, and is assumed to generate a substantial stream of production scrap which, as the downstream indicators show, becomes lithium's first meaningful source of secondary material.

Loading...

Chart 17, Upstream dynamics from refinery to manufacturing for lithium

References

  1. 79. Long-term lithium availability assessments rank deposits by extraction cost—cheaper brine operations (led by Salar de Atacama and Salar de Uyuni) first, followed by progressively more expensive hard-rock deposits, and ocean-derived sources. This sequence, not only the total resource figure alone, determines how fast supply can expand without a sustained price increase. Greim, P., Solomon, A. A., & Breyer, C. (2020). Assessment of lithium criticality in the global energy transition and addressing policy gaps in transportation. Nature Communications, 11(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18402-y
  2. 80. Data sources are included in the Methodology Document.

The Circularity Gap Report is an initiative of Circle Economy, an impact organisation dedicated to accelerating the transition to the circular economy.

© 2008 - Present | RSIN 850278983